"Irvine is different," says Ray Watson, The Irvine Company's first
planner and a pioneer in the city's history. "Irvine is not the helpless
accumulation of the happenstance of growth in the latter half of the 20th century.
Rather, it is the calculated result of, first, vision, then a plan; then a continuum
of more planning, design, public input, construction and, ultimately, the fusing
of plan, structures and human habitat."
|
photos from Irvine Ranch Website. (Shady Canyon)
The Irvine Company is responsible for the development of Irvine, California,
which is located in Orange County. A hundred square miles of land 35 miles
southeast of downtown Los Angeles was purchased by James Irvine in 1867 and
remained in the family until it was sold 110 years later. Originally a
Spanish land-grant ranch, James Irvine, Jr. inherited the land in 1886 and eight
years later formed the Irvine Company, which began as a combined citrus grove
and cattle-ranch venture. The reason this property remained in one piece
was due to the fact that James Irvine, Jr. willed 54.5% of the Irvine Company
to a foundation controlled by life trustees (Garvin 341). Because of this,
the heirs that owned the remaining property could not sell. In the 1950s,
the pressure to develop the land was increased by continually rising real estate
taxes. At this point Orange County’s postwar population
was 200,000, but would rapidly increase to more than 2 million by 1987 (Kling
2). This area was an attractive speculation from the beginning because
of its ideal climate, proximity to Los Angeles, and its rural landscape.

The Plan for Utopian Suburbia
Postsuburban spatial organization is no accident.
It is the result of complex and weakly coordinated sets of conscious decisions
by private entrepreneurs and many politicians who reflect their interests (Kling
10).


<Maps from Mapquest and Irvine Company Website>
As time wore on, the Irvine Company was eager to push development on the rest
of their land holdings, but was faced with controversy. They finally agreed
to donate approximately 75% of the land for parks and open space in exchange
for being able to build a few thousand homes and hotels. The developer
learned to use this as a point of appeal:
More than half of the historic 93,000-acre Irvine Ranch®
will be forever protected as open space and for recreational use. In this
single fact, you begin to appreciate what life on The Irvine Ranch holds in
store. And to value what has not been built as much as what has.
For over a century, from the 1897 dedication of Irvine Regional Park to the
11,000-acre North Ranch Land Gift, the quiet majesty of canyons, coastlines,
trails and wetlands continue to grace the land and enrich people’s lives.
-Taken from
Irvine Ranch Website
“I don’t think we thought of ourselves as building cities,”
said Tom Nielsen, vice chairman of the Irvine Company, “There was no vision
that we were building a city for tomorrow. We were doing a better job
of suburbanizing Southern California and trying to take the conflicts out of
traffic patterns (Garreau 295).”
In Irvine, organized land uses separate the homes from businesses. Quiet residential
neighborhoods and dynamic business districts are close together, but buffered
from each other. The Irvine Plan takes much pride in its transportation network.
Unlike typical American cities that are heavily gridded in their road systems,
Irvine strayed away from that because such grids often impact local neighborhoods.
Irvine's road system carries higher speed and high-capacity cross-town traffic
around residential areas, not through them. From the start, roads were designed
to be modified to handle increasing traffic from economic and residential growth
anticipated in the city's general plan, including the influences of regional
traffic.
Architecture
|
|
|
| 2001 Population 2000 Population 1998 Population 1996 Population 1990 Population 1980 Population 1971 Population |
148,000 143,072 129,294 127,200 110,330 62,134 14,231 |
| Under 15 years 15-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-59 years 60-64 years 65+ years |
19.3% 18.6% 15.0% 17.3% 19.5% 3.0% 7.2% |
| Median Age | 33.4 |
| White Asian & Pacific Islander Hispanic Black Other |
57% 29.8% 7.4% 1.4% 4.4% |
|
Under $14,999
$15,000 - 24,999 $25,000 - 34,999 $35,000 - 49,999 $50,000 - 74,999 $75,000 - 99,999 Over $100,000 |
8.0% 6.5% 9.1% 14.8% 22.4% 15.6% 23.6% |
| Per Capita Household |
$29,163 $62,469 |
| Housing Units Single Units Multi-Family Seniors and Congregate Care Mobile Home Median Value Owners Renters Average Rent |
53,711 40.0% 56.0% 3.98% .02% $356,000 60.0% 40.0% $1,400 |
| Total Average Size Households w/Children Marital Status Married Single, Never Married Divorced, Separated, Widowed |
51,199 2.62 37.5% 69.6% 25.9% 11.3% |
| Total In-City Businesses Commercial Businesses Home Occupation Total Estimated Employment Unemployment Rate |
9,813 7493 2320 168,000 3.7% |
Demographics taken
from City of Irvine Website


The freeway (the 405 San Diego Freeway) is an integral part of the Irvine Community
as it connects this community to the rest of the Southern California region.
<photos from Mapquest and History of Orange County Website>
Conclusion
Irvine continues today to be a bustling community inhabited by the middle and
upper-middle class and appears to have succeeded despite worries of car dependency
and unaffordable housing for lower-income groups. The city has constructed
an image of a perfect society complete with good schools, low crime, healthy
living, parks and open space. All these things continue to appeal to consumers.
Those of lower-income have accepted that Irvine is not a livable place for them
and tend to settle in other regions of Orange County or in surrounding counties.
The Irvine Company continues to develop shopping centers and business complexes
in the area to supplement this utopian community. It has succeeded as
they had intended, aside from the original effort to make housing affordable
to all incomes, but the city planners from the beginning predicted this drawback.
Apparently, the Irvine Company sees no reason why Irvine cannot be a middle-class
community. Over time, as the city becomes more popular, land values
may increase, resulting in the shift of lesser-incomed residents out of the
city, one-by-one till Irvine becomes an elite community similar to that of Newport
Beach or Beverly Hills. It is interesting to note the possibility of such
change, for one would never think that suburbia could go from being the affordable
option to strictly elite. It is the Irvine Company that is responsible
for the shape the community of Irvine has taken. Through their private
speculation and planning, they were able to construct a sustainable city that
will continue to thrive for many more years.
Promotional Videos from the
Irvine Company
Bibliography
Baldassare, Mark. Trouble in Paradise: The Suburban Transformation in
America. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Brown, Laurie. Recent Terrains: Terraforming the American West. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
Garreau, Joel. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday
Publishing, 1991. pp. 262-301.
Garvin, Alexander. The American City: What Works, What Doesn’t.
New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1996. pp. 341-343.
Eds. Kling, Robert, Spencer Olin, Mark Poster. Postsuburban California:
The Transformation of Orange County Since World War II. Los Angeles: University
of California Press, 1991.
Goldberger, Paul. “Orange County: Tomorrowland—Wall to Wall.”
New York Times, 11 Dec. 1988.
Kao, Kenneth. “History of Orange County, California.” Updated
19 April 2002. <
http://members.aol.com/kennykao/ochistindex.html >. Cited 22 April
2002.
The James Irvine Foundation Website.
http://www.irvine.org/about_irvine/mission.htm.
The Irvine Company Website.
http://www.irvinecompany.com/index.asp.
The Irvine Ranch Website.
http://www.irvineranch.com/index.asp .
OCThen Website. John Harris.
http://www.octhen.com/cities/ir/peoplemover.htm .
The City of Irvine Website.
http://www.cityofirvine.org/